Arrendell Primary Education Centre

Home Staff Students' Work Articles Term Dates Links Contact Details How to Find Us

   

Teaching the Craft of Narrative Writing

 by Gwenda Sanderson © 2002

 

Taken From:

Sanderson, G., ‘Teaching the Craft of Narrative Writing,’ in Reading Around Series, Dr Fred Gollasch (Ed), Australian Reading Association, No. 1 March 1989.

 

 

The door creck open and in walket a non-vegetarian giant.  He opend his mouth and rord.  And then he grabed me and begane to pall me nere and nere to his mouth.  Then he pushet me in his mouth then ate me.  All blood came running out and then he walket out the door.   (Andrew)

 

Our students are writing more, but while we see the evidence of the increased quantity of writing, there has not, in many cases, been an accompanying improvement in quality.  In particular, much of the narrative writing that students produce is characterised by a flat, lifeless style that lacks reader appeal and offers little satisfaction to the writer.

 

The type of writing that I am referring to may have the following features:

1.      We don’t SEE the character(s), the action or the setting.  ‘Word pictures’ are lacking.

2.      Conversation is either absent of limited and/or unnatural.

3.      Character feelings are not shown.  We don’t see the character as a real person.

4.      There is no plot.  The main character does not have a problem.  There are no plot hooks.

5.      The writer’s voice is absent.  The writing is timid and reserved, making the style uninteresting.

6.      Titles, lead sentences and character names are uninviting.

7.      There are gaps in the story.  Necessary details are missing.  They’re in the child’s head.

8.      There are no surprises.  There is no cheekiness, no fun.

9.      Sentences are too long.  There are too many ‘and thens’.

10.  Story ending is flat, often finishing with a sentence such as ‘And then I woke up.’

 

How often we end up with stories like Andrew’s.  How can we help our students write fiction pieces that they and their audience will value and enjoy?

 

Lucy Calkins in The Art of Teaching Writing (1986) gives similar examples to Andrew’s piece to illustrate the problems of teaching fiction writing, and the difficulty of responding to those pieces which leave you thinking ‘So what?’, those stories that ‘go on and on, an interminable string of incidents’, such as Jerome’s story:

 

One day I was coming out of MacDonalds and I saw a car crash into a lady.  The blood was gushing everywhere.  Bullets zoomed past me.  Screams filled the air.  I dropped my hamburger, I was so scared.  Then I saw the criminal.  I ran and ran and ran after him until he was caught for good.

THE END

The Art of Teaching Writing (p. 318)

 

Lucy Calkins makes some suggestions concerning focussing on characterisation, plot, setting and mood.  She believes that the ‘personal force’ that appears to be lacking in stories like Jerome’s comes to a piece of writing when the writer stands in the character’s shoes and feels with the character’s heart.

 

I would like to develop some of these points and suggest other ways of helping children write quality fiction.  I shall examine eight specific aspects of the narrative writer’s craft – as demonstrated by three successful writers – and I will show you how these aspects of the craft can be taught.

 

The three authors whose work I have chosen as examples are Paul Jennings, Kate Walker and Roald Dahl.  Their books cover picture books to full texts.  The books I’ve selected are:

Dahl, Roald (1988), Matilda, Jonathon Cape, London.

Jennings, Paul (1986), Unbelievable, Penguin, Ringwood, VIC.

Jennings, Paul (1985), Unreal, Penguin, Ringwood, VIC.

Walker, Kate (1987), King Joe of Bogpeat Castle, Martin Educational, Gosford, NSW.

Walker, Kate (1988), Suzie and the Pencil-case Genie, Martin Educational, Gosford, NSW.

Walker, Kate (1987), The Frog Who Would be King, Martin Educational, Gosford, NSW.

 

The Narrative Writer’s Craft

When writing stories, children are often set up with pen and paper and told to write.  This is rather like a swimming teacher who says, ‘Swim!’ and then gives little more instruction on what to do!

 

By isolating and demonstrating the techniques of writing to students we show them what they can do to make their stories better in real terms.

 

Some basic writing techniques – the ‘tricks of the trade’ – can be taught incidentally in conferencing about reading and writing.  We can also demonstrate them specifically in mini-lessons prior to writing.

 

Word Pictures

Word pictures SHOW us the character, the action, the setting.  The writer needs to write in pictures, so the reader can SEE the story.  ‘Show me – don’t tell me’ is my motto for word pictures.

 

Example 1

Mr Wormwood was a small ratty-looking man whose front teeth stuck out underneath a thin ratty moustache.  He liked to wear jackets with large brightly coloured checks and he sported ties that were usually yellow or pale green.

Matilda (p.23)

We can SEE Mr Wormwood.

 

Example 2

She led him along a dark, narrow passage and up some wooden stairs.  The house was filled with junk: broken TV sets and old bicycles, piles of books and empty bottles.  The stair rails were covered in cobwebs.  They went into a small room at the top of the house.

Unreal (p. 40)

We can SEE the scene.  This is much more interesting than telling the reader, ‘It was an old house filled with junk’.

 

Example 3

In ‘One Shot Toothpaste’ (Unbelievable, pp 7-15), Paul Jennings has a character called Old Monty.  The only picture we have of this person’s appearance is: ‘one fusty, old, green tooth right in the middle of his mouth’ (p.9).  Yet the picture is powerful enough to trigger our imaginations.

 

Suggesting to children that they ‘write descriptions’ is an intellectualisation.  Description is an abstract concept, whereas the term ‘word pictures’ is an actualisation.  It is a tangible, concrete term.  You can hold a picture.  You can see it.  You can control it.

 

Conversation

Conversation should bring life to the character giving it breath and reality.

 

Conversation has to match the character, of course.  A teenage boy will sound quite different from an old lady.

 

Example 1

I crashed right into someone and sent them flying.  It was old Mrs Jeeves from across the road.  ‘Sorry,’ I said.  ‘Gee, I’m sorry’.  I helped her stand up.  She was a bit short sighted and it was dark.  She hadn’t noticed that I didn’t have clothes on.  Then the moon came out – the blazing moon.  I tried to cover my nakedness with my hands, but it was no good.  ‘Disgusting,’ she screeched.  ‘Disgusting.  I’ll tell you father about this’.

Unreal (p. 103)

 

Example 2

Here is a ghost with particularly distinctive speech:

’But it don’t look good…  I must say it looks bad fer bof ov us….’  ‘ Yer won’t nick off, will ya?’ he said looking at me suspiciously.

Unbelievable (pp. 36-39)

 

Character Feelings

One reason we read is to discover how a character feels in a situation.

 

Example 1

In King Joe of Bogpeat Castle author Kate Walker shows us the physical manifestations of the character’s feelings: ‘Queen Dinah cried and King Joe blew his nose’, at the wedding of their seven sons (p. 5).  Later in the story King Joe sat ‘dejectedly on his barrel of nails, his crown hanging over his nose’ (p. 23).

 

Example 2

Matilda in Roald Dahl’s Matilda hated being continuously told she was ignorant and stupid when she knew she wasn’t.  Here the character’s feelings are shown in her thoughts (p. 29):

The anger inside her went boiling and boiling, and as she lay in bed that night she made a decision.  She decided that every time her father or her mother was beastly to her, she would get her own back in some way or another.  A small victory or two would help her to tolerate their idiocies and would stop her from going crazy.

 

Example 3

Paul Jennings usually shows us the main character’s feelings.  We see characters who are afraid, lonely, miserable, worried, nervous or hurt.  Paul Jenning’s characters often make statements about their feeling such as: ‘It was embarrassing, I can tell you that.’ (Unreal, p. 53)

 

Plot

The main character’s problem and the resolution (or attempted resolution) of that problem is the plot.  Plot is what hooks the reader in.

 

Example 1

In The Frog Who Would be King by Kate Walker, the story commences:

There was once a frog who dreamed of being someone special, someone brave and noble.  He wanted to be a king, but he knew that such a thing could never happen to him while he lived in a lily pond.

Will this frog become a king?  We immediately wonder if this character’s wish will eventuate.

 

Example 2

In King Joe of Bogpeat Castle, the problem is that King Joe is about to lose his fortune and castle.  He asks his royal advisor: ‘What can I do?’ (p.4).

 

The problem is resolved when Queen Dinah finds a source of income that will enable them to stay at the castle forever.

 

A reader is ‘hooked’ into a story that contains problems and continuing uncertainties.

 

Example 3

In ‘Lucky Lips’ in Unreal (pp. 39-50) the story commences:

‘Marcus felt silly.  He was embarrassed’ (p. 39).  Why was Marcus feeling silly?  We have to read to find out.  Ma Scritchet says: ‘I have been waiting for you’.  Why is she waiting for him?  She says (seven lines later): ‘And I know why you have come’.  Why indeed?  We just have to read on to find out why Marcus had put himself in such an embarrassing situation.  These plot hooks are little tantalising uncertainties, or unanswered questions that keep the reader reading.  Then, when we find out why he’s there, we have to read to the end of the story to find out how his problem is ultimately solved.  Will Ma Scritchet really be able to help?

 

Plot is probably the most difficult aspect of story writing.

 

Writer’s Voice and Style

First person/third person

Writers write in the first person or third person.  First person narration is ‘reader friendly’.  The writer speaks directly to the reader; there is a deeper bond between them.

 

Paul Jennings often writes his stories in the first person.

 

Individual Style

Paul Jennings’ language is that of his audience – colloquial, and chatty.  His writing style appeals to children because he writes in their vernacular: ‘they packed up’ (laughing), ‘looked yucky’, ‘kids’, ‘real good bloke’, ‘stuff like that’, ‘pull a fast one’, ‘Well, I really copped it!’.

 

Children often have difficulty relating to many of the established writers because they don’t write in a voice to which they can relate.

 

Roald Dahl writes as if the reader is beside him, hanging onto every word.  He ‘chats’ to his readers often referring to them directly by saying ‘you’, as well as referring to himself, and to both himself and the reader (we, us).

Examples are:

‘…you could ever imagine…’ (p. 7), ‘If I were a teacher…  I would cook up…’ (p. 8), ‘…by that I mean…’ (p. 10), ‘We have to get on.’ (p.9).

 

Titles, Lead Sentences, Character Names

Titles

Paul Jennings’ titles for his short stories are compelling: ‘Skeleton On the Dunny’, ‘Lucky Lips’, ‘Wunderpants’, ‘There’s No Such Thing’.  They sound as if they’re going to be interesting to read.  And they’ re much more interesting to write than straightforward titles.

 

Lead Sentences

The writer wins or loses the reader with the first sentence.  Lead sentences must be arresting.

 

Stories can open with conversation: ‘All right.  So you want to hear the story of the ghost on the dunny’ (Unreal, p. 26), or with a short sentence: ‘Poor Grandad’ (Unbelievable, p. 16), or with personal sharing: ‘My Dad is not a bad sort of bloke’ (Unreal, p. 93), or in the form of a question: ‘“What did you get?” asked my sister Mary’ (Unbelievable, p. 29).

 

They may be intriguing: ‘King Joe of Bogpeat Castle was not like other kings’.  How was he different, we wonder?  He was, in fact, quite a contradiction to our usual idea of a king.

His crown was dented, his castle was crumbling and the only shoes he owned were both for the left foot.  He was the poorest king in all the land.

King Joe of Bogpeat Castle (p. 3)

 

Roald Dahl begins Matilda with a classic understatement: ‘It’s a funny thing about mothers and father.’  He continues his homily: ‘Even when their own child is the most disgusting little blister you could ever imagine, they still think that he or she is wonderful.’ (p. 7)

 

Character Names

Paul Jennings uses a good variety of names, and his names fit the characters: Old Splodge, the principal; M.T. Bin, the dentist – there’s a brilliant twist in the story where this name is important; Souperman, who gets his super human strength from cans of soup; Grandfather McFuddy and Foxy, two cantankerous old men; Griffin, the con artist; Aunty Flo, Bob’s substitute parent; Ma Scritchet, the witch; Mr Peppi, the ice cream man and Scrag Murphy, the school thug.

 

Kate Walker in her book Suzie and the Pencil-case Genie takes a look at the importance of character’s names when writing in a classroom situation.  The teacher reads the class a story about a plumber called Bert McSquirt.  And the protagonist, Suzie, actually builds her story on the strength of a zany character name – Eccleston Quibble-Miff Dibble.

 

Writers often make the name fit the character, or the character suit the name.  For example, in Matilda we have Mr and Mrs Wormwood, the disgusting parents of Matilda; Miss Honey, the sweet, wonderful teacher; Trunchbull, the tyrannical principle; Hortensia, ‘a rugged ten year old with a boil on her nose’ (p. 102), and Bruce Bogtrotter, ‘an eleven year old boy who was decidedly large and round’ (p. 118).

 

Risqué, Fun Writing

Children love characters in stories who do unmentionable things like kiss, pick their nose, burp or get caught naked.  They are amused at references to manure or toilets.  Though adults may not find embarrassing, exaggerated or impossible situations funny, children do.  If such humour is neither boring nor harmful, I don’t think we should censor it in their reading or writing.

 

Example 1

Paul Jennings has Bob whose false tooth falls in the toilet.  He feels compelled to retrieve it (‘Skeleton on the Dunny’, Unreal).  In ‘Wunderpants’ (Unreal) the main character’s clothes are taken away while he is skinny dipping in the creek and he has to steal home naked.

 

Example 2

Kate Walker’s ill-fated characters Reginald and Lil do a bit of smooching: ‘“You see, my dear,” he said, “one kiss is all it takes.  I’ll turn into a prince and our problems will be over.  So pucker up.”’ (The Frog Who Would Be King, p. 13).  In King Joe of Bogpeat Castle there are the exaggerated trumpet players who always play so fiercely they break the courtyard windows.

 

Example 3

Roald Dahl creates a sense of fun and naughtiness by his multitude of one liners such as ‘disgusting little blisters’ (p. 7) for children of doting parents, ‘twaddle’ (p. 8) for doting parents’ talk.  His villain characters say and do outrageous, exaggerated things, for example: ‘“That’s because you’re an ignorant twit,” the father said.  His speech was never very delicate but Matilda was used to it.’ (Matilda, p. 22).  Trunchbull sent children airmail out of windows and over fences, as if she was chucking hammers in the Olympics, as she once had done. (See Julius Rottwinkle’s end in Matilda, p. 110, and the Amanda Thripp scene in Matilda, p. 112-116).

 

The reader laughs at scenes where villains receive retribution for their evils.  Matilda plays several tricks on her parents and as a result, her vain father puts his wife’s platinum blond hair dye on his ‘fine crop of black hair’ (Matilda, p. 56) instead of his hair tonic.  Matilda stuffed a friend’s parrot up the dining room chimney and the parents heard voices and feared burglars.  Armed with a fireplace poker and a golf club, they confront a ghost: ‘Then came the voice again, soft and spooky this time, “Rattle my bones,” it said.  “Rattle my bones.”’ (Matilda, p. 47).  Then there are the tricks Hortensia played on Trunchbull.  She put Golden Syrup on Trunchbull’s chair and put powerful itching powder in Trunchbull’s gym knickers.  The results of these two escapades are graphically and hilariously described.

 

Roald Dahl’s humour is also known for his risqué outrageous comments about things not normally mentioned in children’s books.  On the first page of Matilda he talks about boastful parents: ‘It’s only when the parents begin telling us about brilliance of their own revolting offspring that we start shouting, “Bring us a basin.  We’re going to be sick!”’ (p. 7).  When Trunchbull makes Bruce Bogtrotter eat an entire enormous cake in front of the school, there are sure to be dire consequences.  Sure enough: ‘Suddenly the boy let out a gigantic belch which rolled around the Assembly Hall like thunder.  Many of the audience began to giggle.’ (p. 129).

 

Surprises

There’s a surprise in the tail of nearly every good story.  Such stories leave you with a smile on your face.  You think, ‘Wow, tricked again!  I didn’t expect that to happen!’.

 

For example, in ‘Gum Leaf War’ (Unbelievable, pp. 69 – 87), the main character’s problem is solved when his protracted nose is passed on to the two old codgers, Grandfather McFuddy and Foxy.  This is not the ending we anticipate.

 

Kate Walker always puts an unexpected twist in her stories.  We don’t expect Lil to turn into a frog herself or that Reginald, upon receiving the froggy kiss from Lil, would turn into a handsome prince (‘She put her little sucker foot on his big warty flipper, and gave him a kiss.’  The Frog Who Would Be King, p. 27).  In King Joe of Bogpeat Castle we don’t anticipate that the solution to the king’s financial dilemma will be setting up a fast food restaurant in the castle.

 

Matilda is full of surprises.  We are shocked to find where and how Miss Honey lives and to discover the real relationship between Miss Honey and Miss Trunchbull.  Miss Trunchbull’s end is unforseen, though readers who know Roald Dahl’s writing may perhaps anticipate a suitably proper ending for a ‘baddie’.  Out of the hat, Roald Dahl gives Matilda quite strange hidden powers.  We certainly are surprised at the amazing twist in circumstances at the end.

 

 

Teaching the Narrative Writer’s Craft

Word Pictures

Writing word pictures improves children’s stories 100% from day one.

·     As you lead conferences using published writers or the children’s own stories, ask ‘Did we see character?’ ‘Did we see the principal?’

·     Ask if there are enough word pictures

·     Make up collaborative class stories on the blackboard or overhead projector, or directly into a computer.  Before you commence, have fun designing a person together.  Maybe a student keen on drawing can sketch the character on the blackboard as the class thinks up the features, for example a seventeen year old punk – spiked hair, safety pin through nose, dirty, tattered t-shirt, leather jacket.

·     When I conference, I make word pictures an emphasis.  My response may be something like, ‘That’s a lovely piece of writing Jane.  I particularly liked the way you showed me the dragon – especially the dripping fangs and the great red eye.  You hooked me in…’

 

Conversation

Discuss how much conversation there is in the piece of writing, how it helps us to know the character, how it matches the character.  Did the writer tell us what the character was doing as he spoke, such as ‘“It’s in here,” he said, as he opened the drawer’?

 

Character Feelings

Find stories which don’t show feelings and discuss how the characters are likely to be feeling.  Even one feeling in a story is powerful.

 

Plot

·     Children can be taught to think about plot and to consider it when they are revising their story.

·     They need to ask:

Do I have a problem?  How is the problem solved?  Have I posed an uncertainty?  Are there plot hooks?

·     They can also analyse their story in this way:

The problem was that ……….. wanted/needed/felt ……………………………… but/because ………………………………………….. .    The problem was resolved when …………….. got what was needed or wanted (or didn’t want or need it anymore).

·     Use the terms plot, problems, plot hooks and solutions freely when sharing personal reading or discussing comprehension passages.

·     Discuss problems and solutions in stories you share.  For example,

In ‘Without a Shirt’ (Unreal, pp. 1-15):

Question – What was Brian Bell’s problem?

Answer – Ending each sentence with ‘without a shirt’.

Question – How was the problem solved?

Answer – ‘Burying the old bones of Ben Byron with a shirt.’

In ‘Skeleton on the Dunny’, (Unreal, pp. 26-38):

Question – What is Bob’s problem?

Answer – The ghost of old Ned in the loo.

Question – How did Bob overcome his fear and the ghost?

Answer – The loo blows over in the wind.  Aunty Flo’s stolen painting is found in the roof.  Old Ned, having done his job, floats away.

·     Put examples of volunteered class stories or your own stories on overheads and decide if the story has a plot.  What is the problem?  Has an uncertainty been posed?  Did the writer drop a clue or hint (something odd or mysterious) to help us stay reading to find out what happens?

·     Praise pupils’ use of plot ‘language’, and their attempts to check for plot when revising.

 

Writer’s Voice and Style

Children find it easier to write in the first person.  In first person, they can more easily show us the character’s feelings and thoughts and are more likely to write in a chatty, comfortable style.  In some ways, first person writing is more enjoyable to read.

 

I feel it is better for children to use their own language and have fun in their writing.  Beginning and reluctant writers will find the task of writing less gruelling if they are allowed to write in their own colloquial voices.  It will give them confidence; eventually they can go on to more formal styles.

 

However, it is important to emphasise the need for students to discriminate about where particular colloquialisms or slang would be inappropriate.  Just as we learn to discriminate in the speaking world about what language is appropriate, students need to develop this awareness in their written work.

 

Titles, Lead Sentences, Character Names

Titles

·     Encourage children to choose a title after they have finished their first draft.  Suggest – a word, a question, a phrase from the story, an ambiguous title.  Encourage them to experiment with zany, ‘catchy’ titles.

Lead Sentences

·     Ask students to find lead sentences they like and share them with the class, saying why they are effective.

·     Discuss the use of various lead sentences in writing.  Do they work?  Why or why not?

·     Suggest students avoid leads that are long descriptions, negative statements or action that has nothing to do with the story.  As a rule of thumb, try to avoid lead sentences that being with ‘A’, ‘The’, ‘It’, or ‘There’.

Character Names

·     Encourage students to use made up names in their writing.  They’ll have great fun doing this.

 

Risqué, Fun Writing

I have found that giving children permission to be outrageous in their stories is a great incentive.  Children will be motivated to write for the purpose of reading their stories aloud, and seeing their friends ‘crack up’.

 

Surprise

·     Say: ‘Throw me the unexpected.  Give your story an unexpected twist.  Write unexpected conversation and action.  Mix real life and fantasy.’

·     When you read stories aloud, say, ‘Did we expect that to happen?’

·     When you study stories, ask how children might improve it by adding unexpected twists.

 

Teaching Craft Mini-Lessons

I also share information about the craft of writing during simple, brief mini-lessons before we commence writing.

 

In each lesson I take a focus.  Usually the class and I read a short passage together.  I provide each child with their own copy of the passage.  I read the excerpt and then ask them, ‘Did you enjoy it?  What did you think of the writing style?’

 

If I use the ‘Toothbrush’ incident (Unreal, pp. 93-95), for example, one pupil might respond ‘I liked how Paul Jennings called his dad “the old man”’.  Another child might say, ‘I liked the way the author writes: “That way he is happy.  I am happy and Snot is happy.”’  Another child might say, ‘I liked the way Paul Jennings wrote the conversation.  You can just imagine his dad carrying on like that.’

 

I try to give each child a chance to respond in some way.  I might ask, ‘Hand up if you liked the way Paul Jennings showed his dad behaving when he found out it was mouse hairs on his toothbrush?’  I might ask individuals, ‘What was your favourite part?’

 

Then I focus in on some aspect of the craft, such as the way Paul Jennings writes in such a chatty, colloquial style.  I will point out several examples and ask for more examples.  I might ask the class to think of other authors who sometimes use this style.  I might suggest that in their writing that day the children experiment with the particular aspect.

 

I sometimes find that children who have minimal reading experience have difficulty in conceiving stories.  In such situations, I provide the safety net of offering, the option of retelling the same incident as the author wrote it, or retelling the incident in their own words, with their own embellishments.  I’ve found that suggesting retelling for reluctant, inexperienced writers is particularly helpful to them.  Students may initially choose to retell a story, but half a dozen stories down the line they are off on their own, writing about whatever they want, however they want!

 

As they write, and the more they write, the stronger their writing becomes.  Their writing reflects their understanding of the craft and the result is quality, interesting stories.

 

For further reading

Atwell, Nancie (1987), In the Middle – Writing, Reading and Learning with Adolescents, Boynton/Cook, New Jersey, USA.

Calkins, Lucy (1986), The Art of Teaching Writing, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH, USA.

Calkins, Lucy (1983), Lessons from a Child, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH, USA

Graves, Donald (1983), Writing: Teachers and Children at Work, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH, USA.

Hansen, Jane (1987), When Writers Read, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH, USA.

Murray, Donald (1986), Read to Write – A Writing Process Reader, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, USA.

Murray, Donald (1985), A Writer Teaches Writing, Houghton, Mifflin Co., Boston, USA.

Romano, Tom (1987), Clearing the Way – working with teenage writers, Heinemann, Portsmouth NH, USA

 

The views expressed in this pamphlet are the views of the author.  They do not necessarily represent the view of the editor or the Australian Reading Association.

 

The success of the Reading Around Series depends on the willingness of people to contribute.  If you have ideas for classroom practice which you would like to share with a wider audience we would like to hear from you.  A small fee is paid for published manuscripts.  Contributions and enquiries should be sent to Dr Fred Gollasch, c/- School of Education, RMIHE, PO Box 588, WAGGA WAGGA, NSW, 2650.

 

Members receive the Reading Around Series as part of their membership.  Membership information and additional copies of series pamphlets may be obtained from:

The Australian Reading Association, PO Box 78, Carlton, Vic 3053.

Price: $1 per copy plus fifty cents handling fee.  For orders valued between $5 and $10 add $1; $10 to $15 add $2.50; and over $15 add $3.50.

ISBN 0 949512 20 6.  Reading Around Series

Registered Australia Post NGB 6808

LaserSet by N.S. Hudson Publishing Services Pty Ltd